click here to return to the home page, logo image
What is Plagiarism?

At its simplest, plagiarism is representing someone else's intellectual property as your own. For students at Walden, you are most commonly at risk of plagiarizing when you fail to adequately cite the original source material from which you took words and ideas. As you will see below, the integrity of your work is also compromised when you rely to heavily on secondary sources and direct quotes.

 

Walden University Policy on Plagiarism and Academic Dishonesty

No student shall claim credit for another's work or accomplishments or use another's ideas in a written paper or presentation without appropriate attribution through citations and references. The consequences of plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty can include nonacceptance of work submitted, a grade of "NC" (No Credit) or "F" (Unsatisfactory) for the course in which the violation occurs, written reprimands posted to the student's file, and suspension or dismissal from the University.

 

Walden University requires students to adhere to specific standards for academic quality and integrity. The following sections outline these standards and the related policies and procedures. Walden University regards academic honesty to be essential to the entire academic enterprise. The University defines violations of this policy to include plagiarism, academic dishonesty, and misrepresentation. Such violations will not be tolerated.

 

Students are advised that Walden University subscribes to the "Ethics of Scientific Publication"of the American Psychological Association, as found in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.).

 

Misrepresentation

Statements made and documents supplied by Walden applicants and students must be complete and accurate. Walden University will not tolerate any misrepresentation by a student or applicant of past or current academic programs, degrees, or professional accomplishments. If unexplained discrepancies appear between statements or documents provided to Walden University and information obtained otherwise, save in the case of misspellings and other such inadvertencies, applicants may be rejected for admission and students may be dismissed.

Standards for Written Curriculum Components

Walden University expects the submitted work of students to reflect the standards of the scholarly community, adhere to American Psychological Association or Turabian format guidelines, and be written in fair and accurate language.

 

APA and Turabian Guidelines Walden University requires the written work of students to adhere to the format and style guidelines established by the American Psychological Association (APA). These guidelines are published in the following reference manual:

 

American Psychological Association (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

 

Alternatively, students may follow Turabian guidelines, except in psychology programs.

 

Turabian, K. L. (1996). A manual for writers of term papers, theses, and dissertations (6th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Fair and Accurate Language

Because Walden is committed to the fair treatment of all individuals and groups, the University recommends that faculty, students, and administrators write and speak in a manner that respects human beings, regardless of gender, race, ethnic origins, religious preference, or sexual orientation. Students seeking more information on this topic may wish to consult the American Psychological Association's Publication Manual for reduction of bias in language.

 

Copyright

Unless they are in the public domain, it is illegal to reproduce copyrighted materials without permission of the copyright holder. Walden University rigorously adheres to copyright laws, requesting and/or purchasing proprietary permission to duplicate materials for classroom use.

 

What Is the Difference Between Paraphrasing and Plagiarism?

The fifth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001) indicates you should use quotation marks and a page reference (or paragraph reference in electronic documents) to show you are using the exact words of another writer. You must also cite an author each time you paraphrase, and a page reference is encouraged with paraphrases, as well.

 

A useful explication of paraphrasing appears in The Craft of Research (University of Chicago Press, 1995) by Booth, Colomb, and Williams:

You plagiarize even when you do credit the author but use his exact words without so indicating with quotation marks or block indentation. You also plagiarize when you use words so close to those in your source, that if your work were placed next to the source, it would be obvious that you could not have written what you did without the source at your elbow. (p. 167).

In other words, paraphrasing doesn’t mean changing a single word or two in a few sentences. Paraphrasing means putting an idea into your own words.

 

In the following examples, notice the difference in the three attempts at paraphrasing. In attempt 1, no credit is given to the original authors at all. In attempt 2, a citation appears at the end of the paragraph—but nearly all the words and sentences flow one after another as in the original. In attempt 3, the student successfully rewrote the essence of the original in his own words.

 

Original, from Severin and Tankard (1992)

There is evidence to suggest that newsmakers are becoming particularly savvy about placing items on the media agenda. When for example, President Reagan was running for his second term, he took a tour to promote his administration’s record on environmentalism. The tour was full of photo opportunities, including the president standing on a fishing boat in the Chesapeake Bay and the president wearing a park ranger’s hat at Mammoth Cave, Kentucky. Even though some thought that the Reagan administration had a terrible record on the environment, many people were likely to see photos of the president in the ranger hat and make a positive link between Reagan and the environment.

Paraphrase Attempt 1 (Plagiarism)

Evidence suggests that newsmakers are becoming particularly savvy about placing items on the media agenda. When President Reagan was running for his second term, he took a tour to promote his administration’s record on environmentalism. The tour was full of photo opportunities, including the president standing on a fishing boat in the Chesapeake Bay and the president wearing a park ranger’s hat at a cave in Kentucky. Even though some thought that the Reagan administration had a miserable record on the environment, many people were likely to see photos of the president in the ranger hat and make a positive link between Reagan and the environment.

Attempt 2: Still Plagiarism, Despite the Citation at the End

Evidence suggests that newsmakers are becoming particularly savvy about placing items on the media agenda. When President Reagan was running for his second term, he took a tour to promote his administration’s record on environmentalism. The tour was full of photo opportunities, including the president standing on a fishing boat in the Chesapeake Bay and the president wearing a park ranger’s hat at a cave in Kentucky. Even though some thought that the Reagan administration had a miserable record on the environment, many people were likely to see photos of the president in the ranger hat and make a positive link between Reagan and the environment. (Severin & Tankard, 1992, p. 256).

Attempt 3: Successful Paraphrasing

Severin and Tankard (1992) noted President Reagan’s apparent hypocrisy when he ran for reelection in 1984. By posing for a photo opportunity in a boat on the Chesapeake Bay, Reagan, according to these authors, possibly used the appearance of concern to mislead voters about his actual record on the environment.

 

Two Other Problems Related to Integrity

1. You must not suggest to your reader that you have read something you haven’t. Students make this mistake when incorrectly citing secondary sources. Examine, for example, this paragraph, written by Father Flannigan (1997):

Birds of a feather flock together. Fowl have been found to flee when confronted with foul smells (Foster, 1955), and a few studies (Felix & Phillips, 1984; Freud & Frisch, 1994; Friend & Fate, 1995) found few feathered fowl unfit to fight foes when faced with ferocious forces. 

Can you refer to Foster (1955) if you haven’t read that work? Some students write:

Several studies have pointed to the way birds stick together when faced with difficult challenges (Felix & Phillips, 1984; Foster, 1955; Freud & Frisch, 1994; Friend & Fate, 1995).

Doing so, though, suggests to your reader that you read all these when in fact you probably haven’t--only Father Flannigan (1997) did. At best, you can write:

Foster (as cited in Flannigan, 1997) found that birds leave when they smell bad things.

2. Do not string together a series of direct quotes or even block quotes and expect your reader to think you know what you’re talking about.

 

Some student work looks like a patchwork quilt of other authors’ quotations:

According to Jones (1999):

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. (p. 12)

Smith (2000) argued, however:

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. (p. 12)

Remember: writers need to show they know what they’re talking about and what they’re saying is true. The overuse of direct quotes casts doubt on how much the writer really understands about what he or she is saying.



Google Custom Search
Walden University is accredited by The Higher Learning Commission and a member of the North Central Association, www.ncahlc.org; 312-263-0456. © Copyright 2007 Walden University; Telephone: 800-925-3368